Corridor
---
Status: proved elementary reduction
Date: 2026-08-15
Depends on: ES-TWO-TARGET-SIGNED-BOX-EQUIVALENCE.md, ES-TYPEII-ROOT-GEOMETRY.md, STRONG-ES-MIZONY-THEPAULT-PROVENANCE.md
Claim boundary: this is an elementary consequence of the standard Type-II factor form. It does not prove the strong conjecture or Erdős--Straus, and no novelty claim is made for the size bound itself.
1. Fixed-shift Type-II data
Let
be prime and let
Put
A standard Type-II hit at shift q is equivalent to a factorization
with positive integers B,D,T such that
This is the normalized -1 target in the signed divisor box.
2. Universal upper bound on a successful Type-II shift
Because
and B+D>0,
For positive B,D,
because
Also
Therefore
Substituting
gives
hence
Thus:
Theorem — finite Type-II shift bound
Every standard Type-II solution for prime p≡1 mod4 has an associated shift satisfying
So the strong/Type-II existence problem for a fixed prime has a finite admissible shift corridor.
3. Consecutive-integer parameterization
Define
Every positive shift congruent to 3 mod 4 has the form
The corresponding shifted integer is
Thus the fixed-shift Type-II problem runs through consecutive integers:
The shift bound becomes
Equivalently,
so
Hence only the initial corridor
can support a standard Type-II shift.
4. Exact defect corridor for a hypothetical strong counterexample
Let
be the signed divisor box of C_h modulo q_h.
A Type-II hit is exactly
Therefore a hypothetical prime counterexample to the strong/Type-II conjecture must satisfy simultaneously
for every integer
except the irrelevant case q_h=p, where the shift is not coprime to p.
This is a long finite sequence of coupled factorization defects on consecutive integers.
5. Root form across the corridor
The root geometry says a Type-II hit at h is equivalent to a factorization
with s squarefree and
Thus a strong counterexample must make every consecutive integer in the corridor avoid this complementary-root congruence.
The modulus changes linearly with the position:
So the obstruction is not a collection of independent arbitrary moduli. It is a synchronized pair
6. First two corridor positions
h = 0
For Mordell-hard p, the exact q=3 theorem already gives:
h = 1
The next exact factorization defect can be classified completely in the cyclic group of order six; see the companion q=7 filter note.
Thus the corridor begins with two consecutive integers carrying sharply constrained but different local splitting laws.
7. Strategic consequence
The strong/Type-II route can be attacked as a consecutive defect corridor rather than as an unbounded auxiliary search.
A hypothetical counterexample requires approximately
simultaneous signed-box misses on consecutive integers, each with a linearly changing modulus.
Potential proof tools now include:
- exact small-shift factor restrictions (
q=3,7,11,...); - sieve arguments across the consecutive integers
A+h; - incompatibility of splitting conditions imposed by several small moduli;
- average signed-divisor expansion as
hranges through the corridor; - identifying a short initial segment whose combined local conditions already force a hit.
The shift bound does not solve the strong conjecture, but it turns its fixed-prime search space into a highly structured finite interval.