Ancestry
Read with:
Status: proved analytic corollary of the prime-depth dichotomy
Date: 2026-08-14
Project: Free Computation Foundation / CENTL
Claim boundary: this is a density statement about prime values of the depth parameter k. It does not claim that almost all input primes fail Type A/B, and it does not prove the Erdős-Straus conjecture. The analytic ingredient is the classical Brun/Selberg upper-bound sieve for two linear forms.
Read with:
1. Prime-depth realization is a prime-pair condition
The prime-depth dichotomy proves that for prime k,
Thus the number of realizable prime depth values up to X is
This is a two-linear-form prime problem.
2. Upper-bound sieve
Consider
For every odd prime ell, the congruence
has exactly two residue classes:
or
They are distinct. The prime 2 contributes one harmless local condition.
This is therefore an admissible dimension-two sieve problem. The classical Brun/Selberg upper-bound sieve gives
No conjecture about the infinitude of the prime pairs k,4k-1 is used.
3. Relative density among prime depths
The total number of prime depth values up to X is
Therefore
Hence:
Theorem
Equivalently,
Using the prime number theorem,
4. Stronger global gap lower bound
Every structurally impossible prime depth is also a gap in the full depth spectrum. Therefore, if
then
The sieve estimate gives
This strengthens the explicit single-residue-family bound
coming from prime depths k=4 mod 5.
Because these prime-depth gaps are impossible for every integer, the same lower bound applies to the complement of the hard-class spectrum.
5. Graph interpretation
The prime-depth backbone projection shows that every impossible prime depth is directly shadowed by at least one prime-modulus backbone parent.
Thus the relative-density theorem may be read graphically:
almost every prime-valued node in the depth graph is not a new spectrum vertex at all; it is a one-edge satellite of an earlier backbone vertex.
Only the sparse prime-pair nodes
remain as genuine prime-depth spectrum vertices.
6. What remains unknown
The sieve theorem is an upper bound. It does not prove that infinitely many prime depths are realizable.
Infinitude of prime k for which 4k-1 is also prime is a separate prime-pair problem not resolved here.
This does not affect the global spectrum's infinitude because the prime-modulus backbone produces infinitely many realized depths k=(q+1)/4 as q ranges over primes 3 mod 4, and those depth values need not themselves be prime.
7. Structural message
The depth spectrum is now known to have a remarkable asymmetry on the prime subsequence:
The genuinely difficult spectrum classification is therefore overwhelmingly a problem about composite depth values.