Corridor
Let p be a Mordell-hard prime. Then
Status: proved exact factor-residue classification
Date: 2026-08-15
Depends on: FAB-FIXED-K-SIGNED-DIVISOR.md
Claim boundary: this completely classifies when the fixed fab divisor k=7 succeeds for a Mordell-hard prime. It is one filter, not an all-prime proof.
1. Setup
Let p be a Mordell-hard prime. Then
so p is always a quadratic residue modulo 7.
Set
Because 4^{-1}=2 mod7,
Use 3 as a primitive root modulo 7:
The target signed-product element is
Its discrete-log exponent is:
p mod 7 | N_7 mod 7 | -p mod 7 | target exponent mod 6 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Thus the target is always an odd exponent, as expected from quadratic character.
By FAB-FIXED-K-SIGNED-DIVISOR.md, k=7 succeeds exactly when that target exponent is a signed sum of the exponents of prime factors of N_7, with each prime usable up to its valuation.
Below, “occurrence” counts prime factors with multiplicity.
2. Cases p = 2 or 4 mod 7
Here the target exponent is 5 or 1, i.e. ±1 mod6.
Immediate successes
A prime factor of N_7 congruent to
has exponent ±1, so by using that factor in a or b we hit the target immediately.
If no such factor occurs, the only nonzero exponent types are:
- residues
2,4: exponent±2; - residue
6: exponent3.
A 6 mod7 factor together with any 2 or 4 mod7 factor gives
so that also solves the target.
Conversely:
- using only residues
1,2,4produces only even exponents; - using only residues
1,6produces only exponents0or3.
Neither can produce ±1.
Theorem A
If
then fixed k=7 succeeds if and only if at least one of the following holds:
N_7has a prime factor3 or 5 mod7;N_7has both a prime factor6 mod7and a prime factor2 or 4 mod7.
Equivalently, failure occurs exactly when the prime support of N_7 lies wholly in one of
or
3. Case p = 1 mod 7
Now the target is
which has exponent 3 mod6.
A 6 mod7 factor
Any prime factor
already has exponent 3, so it solves the target by itself.
Hence assume no 6 mod7 factor occurs.
Mixing a ±1 factor with a ±2 factor
A factor 3 or 5 mod7 contributes ±1. A factor 2 or 4 mod7 contributes ±2.
Choosing signs appropriately gives
So the presence of both types solves the target.
Three ±1 occurrences
Any three occurrences from residue classes 3 or 5 mod7 can each be signed to contribute +1, yielding
This remains true when several occurrences come from the valuation of the same prime, because the signed exponent may use any integer between -e and e.
Thus multiplicity at least 3 among the 3/5 classes solves the target.
Necessity
If none of the three mechanisms above occurs, then:
- there is no exponent-3 factor;
- either there is no odd-exponent (
±1) factor at all, in which case every signed sum is even; - or there are at most two
±1occurrences and no nonzero even (±2) factor. Their possible signed sums are among0,±1,±2, never3 mod6.
Hence no other solution is possible.
Theorem B
If
then fixed k=7 succeeds if and only if at least one of:
N_7has a prime factor6 mod7;N_7has a prime factor3 or 5 mod7and also one2 or 4 mod7;- the total valuation multiplicity of prime factors
3 or 5 mod7is at least3.
This is an exact classification.
4. Counterexample consequences
A Mordell-hard prime surviving the k=7 filter must have a highly restricted factorization of
Combined with FAB-HARD-FIRST-FILTERS.md, any genuine prime counterexample must simultaneously satisfy exact restrictions on
The first, second, third, and fifth restrictions come from mod 4, mod 8, and Eisenstein-splitting filters; the present theorem completely specifies the mod-7 signed-divisor obstruction on the fourth shifted form.
5. Why this is useful
The theorem demonstrates that the fixed-k signed-product formulation is not merely computational packaging. For k=7 it yields a complete human-scale obstruction classification.
The natural next targets are k=11, 19, and other small 3 mod4 primes, followed by a simultaneous theorem showing that the resulting shifted-factor obstruction classes cannot all hold for one Mordell-hard prime.